TAPTA'S KHONGTHANG

Fatte fatte hainariba, German gi Hitler
Fatte Fatte ngangnariba, Bin Laden
Fatte Fatte hainariba, Sadam Hussien
Fatte Fatte ngangnariba, Nagaland gi Jeliang
Magi leibak khak khanbagi,
Magi furupkhak khanbagi
Malem pumbana fatte haiba oirami
Adugumba luchingba oiyu latke hairibani
Eikhoigidi magi mama leibak yon-gadou touri
Adugumba meeoidu oiyu latke hairibani
Eikhoigidi magi meeyam minai oihandou touri
Delhi gi machumda laknaringei noi
Houjik leibak loire
Malem da khwaidagi chaokhataba
Lamdam nakhoina oihaley
Band Blockade tourafao tabidedo
Mee khara sidrifao khanadedo
Nathantagi khalaga leibaksidi yonu
Leplamba naran yenakhini khangjou
Pambara tunggi meerolna tin sitnabado
Touribado noina meeyamgine
Tallibado noina eikhoigine
Feiye feiye khanariba, Manik Sarkar
Feiye Feiye sonariba, Hijam Irabot
Feiye feiye khanariba, Nelson Mandela
Feiye Feiye sonariba, Che Guevara
Magi leibaki khanbada
Magi meeyamgi khanbada
Meepum khudingna moi (bu) sak-sonaribani
Adugumba luchingba oiyu latke hairibani
Eikhoigidi magi mama leibak yon-gadou touri
Adugumba meeoidu oiyu latke hairibani
Eikhoigidi magi meeyam minai oihandou touri
Sarkar gi thouong eikhoi amata pamdre
Wakat meefam rally chatpagi mathou tadre
Para tambisi moi haibagi matam heley
Eikhoi mangda taraga lei Thangdouba “khongthang”

YouTube Link

What is Inner Line Permit (ILP)?

What is Inner Line Permit (ILP)?

1. If you’re an outsider and want to travel to MiNA (Mizoram, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh), you’ll need this Inner Line permit (a type of certificate/paper).
2. Even if you’re an Indian citizens and wish to travel to these places, you’ll need an ILP.
3. This provision was made by Britishers under an Act called as Bengal Frontier Provision Act,1873.
4. An outsider cannot take away any rubber, wax, ivory or other forest product (or any book, diary, manuscript, map, picture, photograph, film, curio or article of religious or scientific interest outside these inner line permit areas.
5. This ILP provision was made to give special protection to the indigenous people.
**** What’re the Implications of ILP?
1. ILP certificate can be used only for travel and not for permanent residency in the area.
2. Outsiders cannot buy property in the state.
3. Inter-caste marriages are not possible as residences of outsiders are not permitted.
4. There is no competition among the backward tribes and inflowing foreigners.
5. Although such provisions though are not valid for Central govt employees, security personal, etc.
**** Pro ILP arguments for Manipur...
# Inner line permit should be implemented in Manipur because
# (i) competition increased :
1. After independence, the influx of foreigners/non-locals/outsiders in Manipur has increased exponentially. This has led to increased competition (in jobs, business, election) among locals and outsiders.
2. Foreigners like the Bangladeshi, the Nepalese and the Myanmarese have started standing for local elections and some of them have also emerged victorious!
3. Local youth has to compete with outsiders for state Government jobs, college admissions.
4. Influx of outsiders, changes the demographic structure of the state= in long term, this could post to reservation quota for scheduled Tribes and Scheduled Castes.
#(ii) social problems:
5. Outsiders bring their language and culture. It poses threat to Manipuri language, scripts and local dialects.
6. Drug trafficking cases, incidents of rape and other crimes in the State have become more rampant due to the inflow of outsiders into Manipur.
7. Manipur is one of the six high HIV prevalence states in the country. The influx of migrants is worsening this problem.
8. Lands in tribal belts and blocks are being occupied by non-tribals and Bangladeshis, but the government machineries have done nothing to protect these lands from the encroachers.
9. Since the NE states are already backward in areas of education, infrastructure, etc such a competition has been passing onto the even younger generations.
10. The recent violent riots in Assam is an example on how if immigration is unchecked can lead to severe problems.
11. Outsiders are ready to work for lower wages. This makes difficult for the local Manipuri tribals to get any employment.
#(iii) Valid demand :
12. ILP system is already in place in MiNA (Mizoram, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh), then why should it not be implemented in Manipur, which is in the same geographical area, facing similar problems for immigration.
13. ILP system doesn’t prohibit outsiders from entering into a state. It merely requires them to get registered so they can be easily identified.
14. Any section of the citizens residing in the territory of India or any part there of having a distinct language, script or culture of its own shall have the right to conserve the same. This demand is therefore constitutional and legal.

What is Inner Line Permit (ILP)

What is Inner Line Permit (ILP)?

1. If you’re an outsider and want to travel to MiNA (Mizoram,
Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh), you’ll need this Inner Line
permit (a type of certificate/paper).
2. Even if you’re an Indian citizens and wish to travel to these
places, you’ll need an ILP.
3. This provision was made by Britishers under an Act called as
Bengal Frontier Provision Act,1873.
4. An outsider cannot take away any rubber, wax, ivory or other
forest product (or any book, diary, manuscript, map, picture,
photograph, film, curio or article of religious or scientific
interest outside these inner line permit areas.
5. This ILP provision was made to give special protection to the
indigenous people.
**** What’re the Implications of ILP?
1. ILP certificate can be used only for travel and not for
permanent residency in the area.
2. Outsiders cannot buy property in the state.
3. Inter-caste marriages are not possible as residences of
outsiders are not permitted.
4. There is no competition among the backward tribes and
inflowing foreigners.
5. Although such provisions though are not valid for Central
govt employees, security personal, etc.
**** Pro ILP arguments for Manipur...
# Inner line permit should be implemented in Manipur because
# (i) competition increased :
1. After independence, the influx of foreigners/non-locals/
outsiders in Manipur has increased exponentially. This has led to
increased competition (in jobs, business, election) among locals
and outsiders.
2. Foreigners like the Bangladeshi, the Nepalese and the
Myanmarese have started standing for local elections and some
of them have also emerged victorious!
3. Local youth has to compete with outsiders for state
Government jobs, college admissions.
4. Influx of outsiders, changes the demographic structure of
the state= in long term, this could post to reservation quota for
scheduled Tribes and Scheduled Castes.
#(ii) social problems:
5. Outsiders bring their language and culture. It poses threat
to Manipuri language, scripts and local dialects.
6. Drug trafficking cases, incidents of rape and other crimes in
the State have become more rampant due to the inflow of
outsiders into Manipur.
7. Manipur is one of the six high HIV prevalence states in the
country. The influx of migrants is worsening this problem.
8. Lands in tribal belts and blocks are being occupied by non-
tribals and Bangladeshis, but the government machineries have
done nothing to protect these lands from the encroachers.
9. Since the NE states are already backward in areas of
education, infrastructure, etc such a competition has been
passing onto the even younger generations.
10. The recent violent riots in Assam is an example on how if
immigration is unchecked can lead to severe problems.
11. Outsiders are ready to work for lower wages. This makes
difficult for the local Manipuri tribals to get any employment.
#(iii) Valid demand :
12. ILP system is already in place in MiNA (Mizoram, Nagaland,
Arunachal Pradesh), then why should it not be implemented in
Manipur, which is in the same geographical area, facing similar
problems for immigration.
13. ILP system doesn’t prohibit outsiders from entering into a
state. It merely requires them to get registered so they can be
easily identified.
14. Any section of the citizens residing in the territory of India
or any part there of having a distinct language, script or
culture of its own shall have the right to conserve the same.
This demand is therefore constitutional and legal.

HUNGER MARCHERS’ DAY & BIRTH OF STUDENTS’ FORCE IN MANIPUR

Tuesday, 26 August 2014
Written by  Seram Neken

(A tribute to the Hunger Marchers of 1965)

After the so called first and second Nupi Lal (women’s wars) against the malpractices of the respective regimes in 1904 and in 1939 during British rule in Manipur, the students’ uprising of 27 August 1965 was the biggest movement against the injustices meted out by the government in the post-merger period in Manipur history. Besides being a revolt against the artificial famine created by rich businessmen in collusion with the then government, it signified an expression of people’s intent desire to live with dignity, self-reliance and self-determination within the framework of Indian Constitution.

Friday, 27 August 1965 is a red letter day for Manipur. It was on this historic day in 1965 that students protesting against the artificial famine created by the then government were brutally charged and some of them even killed inside the compound of the then Chief Commissioner of Manipur.
Nabakumar, Nilamani and Pramodini sacrificed their lives on the spot for the cause of the people. Laishram Chaobhal Singh (of Lamphel High school) succumbed to his injuries on Sept 26, a month after the incident.  Among those who sustained bullet injuries were Laishram Mangi (Imphal college), Kumar and Budhi (both of DM College), while N. Ibohal Singh was seriously injured in lathi-charge. The rightful demand of the students for right to food was responded with bullets of the then government forces. The unfortunate event gave birth to the All Manipur Students Union (AMSU).

On 28 August 1965, a meeting of students presided by Nameirakpam Madhusadan Singh was held at the residence of Leihaothabam Saratchandra Sharma at Keishampat Laisom Leirak, leading to the formation of AMSU. Next day, the first Executive Council of AMSU was constituted at a meeting held at Uripok Tourangbam Leikai (residence of Gurumayum Jatishwar Sharma) and presided over by N. Birendrakumar. Shri Thiyam Gambhir and Loitongbam Tombi Singh were elected as the President and the General Secretary of the 36-member Ad-hoc Executive body of AMSU. Shri N. Birendrakumar, H. Joykumar and M. Manikumar were the Joint Secretaries. Members were Y. Brojen, Pukhrambam Kullachandra, Seram Mangi Singh, L. Ibohal, Y. Dijen, Ng. Sankar, L. Saratchandra, Syamkumar, Loitingbam Kanhai, Khwairakpam Subash, N. Sarat, Ksh Nabakumar and G. Yaima. Among those who took active role in the formation of the union were Md. Abdul Shah, M. Sanajaoba, L. Kaminikumar, O. Nabakumar, Gokul Singh, Salam Ibohal, A Basudev, P. Ibohal, S. Kirankumar, Shyamsundar, A. Yaima and L. Ibohal. The main agenda before the first Executive Council were the institution of judicial enquiry on the 27th August incident and release of the arrested student activists.
On 12 September 1965, a meeting of all the students of Manipur held at M.D U hall elected the second Executive Council of AMSU. 17 student leaders who were released from jail on that day were also present in the meeting. Shri Sanajaoba Naoriya, Shri Thiyam Gambhir and Shri Gurumayum Joykumar Sharma were elected as the President, the Vice-president and the General Secretary of the Council respectively. Shri Loitongbam Iboyaima and Shri Meinam Manikumar were the Finance Secretary and the Publicity Secretary respectively. Shri Seram Mangi Singh, Loitongbam Tombi, Soyam Lokendrajit, Y. Rajen Singh, Laitonjam Ibopishak, Th. Ibohal Singh, L. Raghumani Singh, Ksh Iboyaima Singh, Kh. Joysakhi Devi, Laishram Jugobala Devi, Kh. Ibetombi Devi, Ch. Devola Devi, Ksh Kunjalata Devi and AK Santi Devi were the members of the council. A four member Advisory Board was formed with Shri N. Ibohal Singh, KN Singh, S. Ibotombi Singh and N. Birendrakumar Singh. A five member Civil Defence Board was formed with Shri Seram Mangi Singh as Chairman and Shri L. Saratchandra Sharma as Secretary. Shri H. Joykumar Singh, Kh. Subash Singh and Kh. Ibetombi Devi were the other members. The members of the Board of Editors were Ibohal Singh, G. Joykumar Sharma, H. Joykumar Singh, L. Iboyaima Singh, W. Ibempishak Devi, Y. Sabitri Devi, G. Sobita Devi and S. Lokendra Singh.

On 10 February 1966, the Constitution Drafting Committee of AMSU was constituted with seven members namely Thiyam Gambhir, Y. Rajen, A.Birendra, Kh. Joysakhi, Jadumani, N. Ibohal and Ksh. Iboyaima. A meeting held at Aryan Theatre on 14 August 1966 took the decision to install a memorial site at Pishum Ching and to observe the Hunger Marchers’ Day on 27 August every year. On 26 December 1966, the Constitution of AMSU was adopted at the 20 Executive Council meeting of the Union held at Paradise Club, Wangkhei. Shri Leihaothabam Saratchandra Sharma, Huidrom Yaima and Seram Mangi Singh were the President, the Vice-President and the General Secretary of the Union duly elected by the students under its new Constitution. Other members were L. Khuarileima Devi as Finance Secretary, Moirangthem Santikumar as Publicity and Information Secretary, Kullachandra Singh as Secretary–at-large, and Sanjenbam Sangita Devi as Asst. General Secretary,  while G. Gunamani Sharma, RK Memsana Devi, RK Premlata Devi and Momon Devi remained as Executive Members. (Reference: Souvenir published on the Silver Jubilee Celebration of AMSU,1965-1990)
As an apex body of students of Manipur and as a pressure group protecting the indigenous rights of its people, AMSU has been credited with various social and political reformations of Manipur during the past five decades.
On 28 July 1967, a conference of all students (hills and valley) held at DM College raised issues such as emotional integrity among the students of Manipur, role of students in social development, Grievances of students. Paite, Gangte, Zeliangrong and representatives of other Naga student organizations participated in the conference. It was the first pressure group of Manipur to object to the efforts for unification of Naga inhabited areas into Nagaland in 1968. AMSU strongly condemned the efforts of some Naga leaders for unification of Naga inhabited areas into Nagaland and its endorsement by the then Nagaland Chief Minister T.N Angami. The Union submitted its memorandum to the then Prime Minister of India with its rigid decision to safeguard the territorial integrity of the state.

Among the landmark endeavors of the AMSU during the last five decades, mention may be made of the demands for statehood, establishment of Manipur University, conversion of RMC into a regional institute, setting-up of State Human Rights Commission and inclusion of Manipuri language in 8 Schedule of Constitution.  During the students’ agitations on Foreigners Issue in 1980, AMSU reached an agreement with the state government on July 22, 1980 to identify the foreigners with 1951 being the base year. Yet, the agreement has not been implemented by the government for obvious reasons.
AMSU from time to time has been instrumental in controlling the prices of essential commodities in the state, which the businessmen often tried to swell at their own whim. Removal of Armed Forces Special Powers Act. has long been a demand of the students of Manipur under the banner of AMSU. The birth of All Manipur Students’ Union on 28 August 1965 was indeed a turning point in the journey of the Manipuris towards identity construction.
Besides revolting against all kinds of human rights violations including the infamous cases of Sanamacha, Bijoykumar, Manorama and other numerous events, AMSU has been putting efforts in safeguarding the territory of the state for the last many years. On various other occasions, the students’ body rose in revolt against the tendencies of splitting the state’s territory. During the last five decades of the existence of AMSU as an apex body of students, a number of young students either sacrificed their lives or fell victim of the atrocities meted out by state actors while undergoing movements for the people of Manipur. On a number of occasions, the central and state governments tend to malign the image of AMSU as antisocial. However, no force could suppress the force of students who have been working for justice and democratic values. AMSU will ever remain synonymous with ‘Dedication and Sacrifice’ in the history of Manipur.

CHAKLAM KHONGCHAT

The erstwhile drama “Chaklaam Khongchat” produced by AMSU is still known to be very effective in moulding patriotism among the youths of the state. Unfortunately, the unique creation of the late Director Birjit Ngangomba on the script of G. Joykumar Sharma has been off the stage for the last many years. Students were trained and made to act in the play. During the long training and rehearsal, the actors were made to fast so as to show off the real hunger in them. No wonder, the play was so real that a number of acting students fell down unconscious during the show. The drama certainly enlivened the spirit of patriotism and sacrifices among the students of Manipur. If the AMSU revives the Drama for continuous show on every Hunger Marchers’ Day, it would surely instill patriotic sense among the new generation.

Source : Hueiyen Lanpao